News & Updates

In recent years, Minnesota conservatives have fretted over the net loss of population to other states. As with nearly every problem the state confronts, the culprit—according to conservatives—is Minnesota’s progressive tax and fiscal policy. The problem with this theory is that it does not jibe with the facts—especially the most recent information from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the U.S. Census Bureau.

IRS “Statistics of Income” tabulate the number of tax returns filed in each state and the number of exemptions claimed on those returns; the most current data looks at the migration of tax filers* between states from 2015 to 2016. The number of tax filers and exemptions leaving Minnesota has always comprised a small fraction of all Minnesota filers and has always been easily surpassed by natural population growth and international immigration. Since 2013, the share of tax filers who left Minnesota for other states has steadily declined. From 2015 to 2016, they comprised just 0.06% of all tax filers and 0.02% of all exemptions.


Even better news on the migration front comes from the July 2017 population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. From July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017, more people moved to Minnesota from other states than left Minnesota to go to other statesthe first time this has occurred since 2002. Minnesota’s net population increase due to domestic migration (7,941) comprises 0.14% of the state’s 2016 population and approximately 15% of Minnesota’s total 2016-to-2017 population increase.

Conservatives contended that Minnesota would suffer a variety of economic ills as a result of progressive tax increases enacted in 2013, including an exodus of Minnesota taxpayers. The data from the IRS and the Census Bureau indicate that these fears were unwarranted. Consider the following four realities that undermine conservative claims of tax-driven population flight.

First, Minnesota’s net domestic out-migration of tax filers and exemptions has declined steadily since passage of the 2013 tax increases. Domestic net out-migration in Minnesota emerged during the last decade—coinciding with a period when a “no new tax” fiscal agenda was contributing to a decline in real per capita public resources and investments. Now that Minnesota has restored a portion of these budget cuts, the state has enjoyed the first increase in population due to domestic migration since the early 2000’s.

Second, Minnesota has bucked the trend of net population loss due to domestic migration common among other states in the region. Midwestern states† in general have seen a significant net migration to southern and western states—a trend driven in large part by retiring baby-boomers in search of warmer climes. Yet Minnesota is experiencing only a tiny loss of tax filers and exemptions and a small increase in population due to domestic migration.

Third, when it comes to domestic migration, Minnesota is doing much better than other Midwestern states that have followed a much more austere fiscal agenda. Wisconsin is a state much like Minnesota in terms of climate and demography. After several years of budget cuts, tax reductions, and anti-worker policies, Wisconsin continued to lose population due to domestic migration from 2016 to 2017 and has a much higher rate of domestic tax filer loss than Minnesota. And in Kansas—the poster child for conservative fiscal policy—the net population loss due to domestic migration is even higher. The number of taxpayers leaving Wisconsin and Kansas for Minnesota is significantly greater than those going in the opposite direction.

Fourth, net tax filer migration from Minnesota to Florida is significant (nearly 1,500 people from 2015 to 2016), while the net migration to neighboring South Dakota is miniscule. Both Florida and South Dakota have similar tax climates, including no state income tax. If tax climate was a major determinant of location decisions, neighboring South Dakota should be more attractive to Minnesotans than a state 1,600 miles away. This suggests that weather is far more important than tax climate in shaping location decisions.

IRS and Census Bureau information shows that—unlike the rest of the Midwest—Minnesota has averted a significant loss in tax filers and population due to domestic migration. These findings complement data from other sources which show that Minnesota has surpassed the national average in job, GDP, and income growth over the last decade. Once again, conservative claims that progressive tax and fiscal policies would ruin Minnesota’s economy have crashed into the hard wall of fact.

 

*As used here, the term “tax filer” refers to a person who files a federal income tax return.

Based on the Census Bureau definition of “Midwestern states,” which includes Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Illinois is excluded from the graph for scaling purposes. Illinois’ estimated net population loss due to domestic migration from 2016 to 2017 is 117,779—eight times greater than the population loss of the next closest Midwestern state (Kansas); this comprises 0.89% of Illinois’ July 1, 2016 population.

Big Debt, Big Deal

Minnesota is living under a $27 billion mountain of student loan debt.1 A student graduating in Minnesota today has an average of $31,000 in debt.2 Whether we realize it or not, it is affecting both individuals and the broader community. The challenge of student loan...

Minnesota Business Tax Rate Equals U.S. Average

Business groups—including the Minnesota Business Partnership and Minnesota Chamber of Commerce—actively cultivate the notion that business taxes in the Gopher State are high relative to the rest of the nation. However, total state and local business taxes as a share...

Ensure Respect for Minimum Wage Laws

(Note: This article is co-authored with Laura Huizar, a staff attorney at the National Employment Law Project in Washington, D.C.) A few weeks ago, the St. Paul City Council introduced a draft ordinance that would raise the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour. That’s a...

Caring in Central Minnesota

Minnesota is getting older every day.1 The aging of our population is increasing demand for home health and personal care workers. We also continue to have population growth through both immigration and natural growth. To fill the needs of our changing population we...

Gas Tax Buys One-Third Less Today Than in 2000

The single largest source of funding for Minnesota’s transportation system comes from the state gas tax. However, the purchasing power of that tax has dropped by over one-third over the course of the century, leaving funding for state roads and bridges in a precarious...

State Aids: The Shrinking Slice of the City Revenue Pie

City property taxes have increased significantly in recent decades. Even after adjusting for inflation and population growth, the property taxes collected by Minnesota cities have increased by 48% from 1990 to 2018. However, real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) per capita...

Government Growth in Context

Shocking claims of growth in government abound. However, viewed in context of the economic, demographic, and societal changes that have occurred over the last fifty years, the growth in government is far less astounding than the sound-bite statistics indicate. For...

Impact of Legislative Decisions on School Funding

State aid to Minnesota school districts—properly adjusted for inflation—has fluctuated significantly over the last fifteen years, but the overall trend has been downward, as documented in a recent North Star report. Of course, long-term trends are not exclusively the...

Minnesota’s Shared Health

Minnesotans value a high quality of life. It is part of the Minnesota story and one of our competitive advantages. This includes having healthy people in healthy communities. Historically, policy makers have recognized the importance of health care access by investing...

Contact Us

Use this form to get in touch with North Star staff, or send your questions, suggestions, and ideas to staff@northstarpolicy.org.