News & Updates

Photo Credit: Fibonacci Blue

(Note: This article is co-authored with Laura Huizar, a staff attorney at the National Employment Law Project in Washington, D.C.)

A few weeks ago, the St. Paul City Council introduced a draft ordinance that would raise the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour. That’s a good start, but the Council must strengthen the bill’s enforcement provisions—because laws are respected only if they are enforced.

With the city’s high cost of living, the State of Minnesota’s minimum wage simply isn’t enough for many workers to afford basic expenses like rent, groceries, transportation, and health care. The city estimates that more than 56,000 St. Paul workers—31% of the city’s workforce—would benefit from this increase. But given the prevalence of wage theft here and across the country, whether those workers will actually see the benefits depends on strong enforcement.

Wage theft occurs when employers fail to pay the required minimum wage or overtime to workers. A landmark 2009 study surveyed over 4,000 workers and found that one in four had been paid less than the minimum wage, and more than two in three had suffered some type of pay-related violation, such as unpaid overtime or stolen tips, during the previous workweek. A 2017 Economic Policy Institute report found that 2.4 million workers in the ten most populous states lost $8 billion annually to minimum wage violations. And a 2015 survey of Twin Cities workers in the janitorial, restaurant, manufacturing, construction, temp agency, hotel, retail, and other industries conducted by Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en la Lucha (CTUL) found that half of respondents had experienced wage theft. In the janitorial industry, the rate was even higher: two-thirds of janitors reported wage theft.

Based on our experience working locally and nationally with workers, policymakers, and enforcement officials on the issue of wage theft, we urge the City Council to start enforcement off on strong footing by, at a minimum, including a clear “private right of action” along with strong remedies and penalties.

A private right of action gives workers the right to bring a wage theft claim in court. The St. Paul proposed ordinance does not include this option for workers—it only allows them to file a complaint with the city’s Department of Human Rights and Equal Economic Opportunity. Given the high rates of wage theft and the modest size of the Department’s staff and resources, the city cannot be expected to effectively tackle enforcement alone. Most major cities that have adopted minimum wage laws have given workers a right to go to court, including Chicago, Minneapolis, Seattle, Flagstaff, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Albuquerque, Las Cruces, and Santa Fe. Omitting such a provision in St. Paul’s minimum wage law would go against this trend and against what wage theft experts consider a best practice.

St. Paul’s minimum wage ordinance should also include stronger remedies and penalties for violations. Workers should be able to recover all wages they are owed in addition to an amount to compensate them for the time, effort, risk, and costs tied to filing a complaint. Most local and state laws, as well as the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, allow workers to recover “double damages”—in other words, double what they were owed in the first place. Some places, like Arizona, Idaho, Massachusetts, and New Mexico, allow for “triple” damages. Without this remedy, there would be little to deter an employer from stealing wages if they know they will only need to pay back what they owed initially.

Separately, we are concerned that the current draft language significantly limits the authority of the Department of Human Rights and Equal Economic Opportunity. The proposed language requires the enforcement office to ask the St. Paul City Attorney to step in whenever it believes an employer has violated the law. The City Attorney then must go through a hearing process and give each employer a chance to be heard before the full City Council. This creates an unnecessarily cumbersome process that stands to delay, and possibly deny, justice for workers who cannot afford to wait. Instead, we strongly encourage that the final ordinance give the city’s enforcement office the basic authority to issue notices of violation, carry out hearings, and issue final city decisions. With this change, employers could still go to court to appeal their case. This proposal follows the best practices developed and tested around the country.

We commend Mayor Melvin Carter and the City Council’s leadership in proposing a robust citywide minimum wage increase. In the coming weeks, we encourage them to seize this opportunity to both adopt a much-needed minimum wage increase for its workers and ensure that all workers will benefit from it.

Katie Hatt is the Executive Director at the North Star Policy Institute in St. Paul. Laura Huizar is a Staff Attorney at the National Employment Law Project in Washington, D.C.

Big Debt, Big Deal

Minnesota is living under a $27 billion mountain of student loan debt.1 A student graduating in Minnesota today has an average of $31,000 in debt.2 Whether we realize it or not, it is affecting both individuals and the broader community. The challenge of student loan...

Minnesota Business Tax Rate Equals U.S. Average

Business groups—including the Minnesota Business Partnership and Minnesota Chamber of Commerce—actively cultivate the notion that business taxes in the Gopher State are high relative to the rest of the nation. However, total state and local business taxes as a share...

Caring in Central Minnesota

Minnesota is getting older every day.1 The aging of our population is increasing demand for home health and personal care workers. We also continue to have population growth through both immigration and natural growth. To fill the needs of our changing population we...

Gas Tax Buys One-Third Less Today Than in 2000

The single largest source of funding for Minnesota’s transportation system comes from the state gas tax. However, the purchasing power of that tax has dropped by over one-third over the course of the century, leaving funding for state roads and bridges in a precarious...

State Aids: The Shrinking Slice of the City Revenue Pie

City property taxes have increased significantly in recent decades. Even after adjusting for inflation and population growth, the property taxes collected by Minnesota cities have increased by 48% from 1990 to 2018. However, real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) per capita...

Government Growth in Context

Shocking claims of growth in government abound. However, viewed in context of the economic, demographic, and societal changes that have occurred over the last fifty years, the growth in government is far less astounding than the sound-bite statistics indicate. For...

Impact of Legislative Decisions on School Funding

State aid to Minnesota school districts—properly adjusted for inflation—has fluctuated significantly over the last fifteen years, but the overall trend has been downward, as documented in a recent North Star report. Of course, long-term trends are not exclusively the...

Minnesota’s Shared Health

Minnesotans value a high quality of life. It is part of the Minnesota story and one of our competitive advantages. This includes having healthy people in healthy communities. Historically, policy makers have recognized the importance of health care access by investing...

Misplaced Faith in Tax Cuts

Whatever the problem, a tax cut will fix it. And under no circumstances ever increase taxes. So goes the conventional conservative mantra. New research from two Oklahoma State University economists (Rickman and Wang, 2018) finds that reality is far more nuanced than...

Contact Us

Use this form to get in touch with North Star staff, or send your questions, suggestions, and ideas to staff@northstarpolicy.org.