News & Updates

A recent blog post from the Center for the American Experiment (CAE)—Minnesota’s right wing think tank—features an overjoyed Homer Simpson. Homer apparently celebrates the “bonuses and pay hikes” that Minnesota workers are supposedly receiving through recent federal tax cuts. Only Homer—a slow-witted sap that can be duped into any harebrained scheme by a bag of donuts—could think he wins through this most recent foray into trickle-down economics.

The CAE bases its claim on a list from Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform. Businesses on this list claim that recent employee bonuses and pay raises are the result of the so-called “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” enacted by Congress last month. That claim stretches the truth; for example, Walmart’s decision to increase its base wage to a meager $11 per hour likely results from the need to attract workers in a tight labor market, not the federal tax cut—a conclusion reinforced by similar pay increases announced by Walmart in 2015 and 2016. Several companies on the list of pay hikers actively pursue right wing agendas; that they are spinning recent bonuses and pay hikes as the product of federal tax cuts to curry favor with and support for conservative politicians is a distinct possibility. As the New York Times editorial board notes:

It is also very much in the political interest of companies to attribute to the new tax law the changes they make to salaries or investment plans. That’s a surefire way to win favor with Mr. Trump, a notorious sucker for flattery. And it is a way to deflect attention from the insidious aspects of the tax law: It will add about $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years, and many poor and middle-class families will pay more taxes over time.

The corporate pay hikes listed by Americans for Tax Reform don’t include layoffs and business closures that have occurred since passage of the federal tax act. On the same day Walmart announced its pay hikes, it closed 63 Sam’s Club stores nationwide, affecting 9,400 workers. A fair reckoning would offset the pay hikes occurring since passage of the federal tax act with the wage losses due to layoffs and business closures.

A precise sum of all the pay hikes attributed to the federal tax act by Americans for Tax Reform cannot be determined; many businesses give only a range of bonuses and pay hikes given, while others do not identify the number of employees affected. All pay hikes and bonuses attributed to the federal tax act that can be quantified from this list total about $1 billion. If we assume that all of the other pay hikes that can’t be quantified add another $0.5 billion plus, then the grand total of pay hikes and bonuses attributed to the federal tax act would come to approximately $1.5 billion. We have to suppose, of course, that all these pay hikes listed would not have occurred in the absence of the tax act—an extremely generous and unlikely supposition. This estimate also ignores all post-tax act layoffs and resulting wage losses.

According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, next year U.S. businesses will receive $157 billion in tax breaks due the 2017 tax act. Based on our rough back of the envelope calculations, the pay hikes resulting from the federal tax act will come to about a penny on the dollar of the total tax relief bestowed on businesses. A large portion of this penny consists of one-time bonuses; while the business tax breaks resulting from the federal tax act will continue into future years, the bonuses for workers might not. Over time, the workers’ share of each dollar of business tax breaks could shrink to less than a penny.


The information provided by Americans for Tax Reform proves what progressives have been saying all along: the portion of the total federal tax relief that will trickle-down to working people is miniscule. The vast majority of the relief will instead accrue to shareholders, business owners, and executives, thereby increasing the concentration of wealth at the very top of the income spectrum. As former U.S. Labor Secretary and University of California Berkeley public policy professor Robert Reich observed:

American corporations already have more money than they know what to do with. Their profits are at record levels. They’re using them to buy back their shares of stock, and raise executive pay. That’s what they’ll do with the additional $1 trillion they’ll receive in this tax cut.

The CAE and Americans for Tax Reform ignore the downside risk to working families resulting from the federal tax cuts. To pay for these cuts, conservatives are floating plans to cut to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, food stamps, and other federal assistance to low-income and working families. While businesses and high-income households get the lion’s share of federal tax cuts, the less well-heeled will likely bear the brunt of federal budget cuts. Reich notes that the federal tax act “will make it harder to finance public investments in education, health, and infrastructure, on which the future competitiveness of American workers depends.”

Spending cuts will probably not offset the estimated $1.5 trillion increase in the federal deficit inflicted by the tax cuts. In turn, the federal government will need to issue more debt, which could potentially crowd out private debt issuance that funds economic expansion. The end product is a less vibrant economy with less job growth, which in turn means less upward pressure on wages. In the long run, lackluster economic performance, fewer jobs, lower wages, and reduced federal benefits will almost certainly overwhelm trifling and possibly temporary pay increases from the federal business tax cuts.

So enjoy your penny while you can, Homer. In the end, you and other working people will be left holding the bag for the 2017 federal business tax breaks.

Big Debt, Big Deal

Minnesota is living under a $27 billion mountain of student loan debt.1 A student graduating in Minnesota today has an average of $31,000 in debt.2 Whether we realize it or not, it is affecting both individuals and the broader community. The challenge of student loan...

Minnesota Business Tax Rate Equals U.S. Average

Business groups—including the Minnesota Business Partnership and Minnesota Chamber of Commerce—actively cultivate the notion that business taxes in the Gopher State are high relative to the rest of the nation. However, total state and local business taxes as a share...

Ensure Respect for Minimum Wage Laws

(Note: This article is co-authored with Laura Huizar, a staff attorney at the National Employment Law Project in Washington, D.C.) A few weeks ago, the St. Paul City Council introduced a draft ordinance that would raise the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour. That’s a...

Caring in Central Minnesota

Minnesota is getting older every day.1 The aging of our population is increasing demand for home health and personal care workers. We also continue to have population growth through both immigration and natural growth. To fill the needs of our changing population we...

Gas Tax Buys One-Third Less Today Than in 2000

The single largest source of funding for Minnesota’s transportation system comes from the state gas tax. However, the purchasing power of that tax has dropped by over one-third over the course of the century, leaving funding for state roads and bridges in a precarious...

State Aids: The Shrinking Slice of the City Revenue Pie

City property taxes have increased significantly in recent decades. Even after adjusting for inflation and population growth, the property taxes collected by Minnesota cities have increased by 48% from 1990 to 2018. However, real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) per capita...

Government Growth in Context

Shocking claims of growth in government abound. However, viewed in context of the economic, demographic, and societal changes that have occurred over the last fifty years, the growth in government is far less astounding than the sound-bite statistics indicate. For...

Impact of Legislative Decisions on School Funding

State aid to Minnesota school districts—properly adjusted for inflation—has fluctuated significantly over the last fifteen years, but the overall trend has been downward, as documented in a recent North Star report. Of course, long-term trends are not exclusively the...

Minnesota’s Shared Health

Minnesotans value a high quality of life. It is part of the Minnesota story and one of our competitive advantages. This includes having healthy people in healthy communities. Historically, policy makers have recognized the importance of health care access by investing...

Contact Us

Use this form to get in touch with North Star staff, or send your questions, suggestions, and ideas to staff@northstarpolicy.org.